Davies Memorial Unitarian Universalist Church
Home Welcome About Us Message Music Community Contact Us
     

Unitarian Universalist Theism

Bookmark and Share

By Dr. Bruce T. Marshall
February 6, 2011

Reading:

The Faith of a Theist
Rosemary Bray McNatt

Early in my ministerial internship, I was responsible for leading the congregation in a period of prayer and meditation. After the service ended, a long-time member pulled me aside. “When you were praying this morning, you were addressing your prayers to someone, weren't you?” she asked. “Yes, I was,” I said. The woman looked incredulous. “You don't think there's really someone there, do you?”

“Yes,” I answered, “I really do.”

Becoming a Unitarian Universalist was the path that led me back to God. Brought up in an African American Roman Catholic home, I measured my childhood days by the feast of the saints and the holy days of obligation. By the time I was ten, I found my youthful devotion challenged by the rigidity of the church and deeply damaged by its rejection of women's gifts, even when those gifts were as small as my desire to serve Mass as my younger brother did several times each week. My spirit crushed, I tossed aside both the church and all thoughts of God before I reached my teens.

Not that God wasn't due for some serious criticism from me by that time. The unfairness of life, the poverty and racism I knew from personal experience, the violence that was present all around had me asking tough questions about the God my mother clung to with such fervor. I informed her that whatever God she thought she knew had done her precious little good and that I was fed up with all this religious mythology.

My mother, bless her, was more than used to her oldest girl. She simply looked at me and said, “Just keep on living, baby. You'll find out.”

In my late twenties, I married my college sweetheart, an African American Unitarian Universalist by birthright. (And) I started attending the Community Church of New York to live out the fantasy of being a dutiful young wife. After a time, I began to pay attention, not just to coffee hour, but to the hour before that, when the community gathered amid the banners representing the great religions of the world. I sat beneath those banners and heard from the pulpit and the pews the deepest longings of my heart. I learned about the similarities among the great religions of the world, about their common hopes and aspirations for humanity. I heard about the beloved community. And I heard about all these things in the context of freedom, the freedom to think for myself about God and about the world.

No one required me to make promises I could not keep. There was no list of beliefs that determined whether I was in or out of favor. And most importantly, there were no gatekeepers who decided on my worthiness or unworthiness. Everyone in the sanctuary, including me, was part of a glorious creation.

But as my mother told me earlier, I kept on living. I kept on living in a world filled with tears and tragic events that had no easy explanations. I kept on facing great joy and deep disappointment. I kept on being confronted by hopeless situations that unexpectedly came to amazing conclusions. Thanks to the freedom I found as a Unitarian Universalist, I continued to ask what it was that I was experiencing.

And then, one day, God spoke. On retreat at a women's conference in Wisconsin, I joined with other participants in a sacred spiral dance. Asked as part of the dance to speak to the divine and listen for an answer, I joined in, impatient, skeptical, and freezing cold. As I made a perfunctory list of my concerns, I could suddenly feel a Presence in me. It was a Presence that made itself felt in every cell of my body, and it was followed by a Voice, neither male nor female, and utterly unlike anything I had ever felt. The Voice made itself heard in my body, and it told me clearly, lovingly, “Don't worry, my child, don't worry.” And then the Voice and Presence left me, and left me changed forever.

Most of the great Western theologians agree at least on this: God is beyond naming or full understanding, yet we human beings nonetheless are called to make the attempt. It is the free faith of Unitarian Universalism that makes my attempts worthwhile. Because of this faith, I can be confident that my search for the Divine is structured, not by static institutions or individuals, but by the God who continues to call me and whom I continue to question. Because of this powerful freedom to believe—and to doubt—I live in trust, believing the truth of the mystic Julian of Norwich's proclamation, “all will be well, and all will be well, and all manner of things will be well.”


Abridged from The Faith of a Theist: There Must Be a God Somewhere
By Rosemary Bray McNatt

www.uua.org/publications/pamphlets/theologicalperspectives/151239.shtml


Sermon:

The psychiatrist C. G. Jung was once asked by an interviewer, “Do you believe in God?”

This was Carl Jung, who was Sigmund Freud's disciple and for a time his designated successor—Jung, who ultimately broke with Freud for a variety of reasons, including their contrasting views on religion. For Freud, religion was a vast illusion, a childish response to the challenges and horrors of life. But Jung saw something different: a pathway into the depths of the soul. For Jung, each religion offered a set of stories and symbols that led into deeper levels of being and touched something universal that resides at the core of existence.

So when Jung was asked this question, “Do you believe in God?” he paused, looked for a moment like he was struggling for words, and then said, “I could not say I believe. I know! I have had the experience of being gripped by something greater than myself, something that people call God.”

This morning’s sermon is the second in a series in which I am trying to articulate varieties of belief held among Unitarian Universalists. As a free faith, we offer an openness to different beliefs, all contained within this one religious community. Last week, I considered Unitarian Universalist Christianity, in which the life of the man, Jesus, is the central reference for one’s spirituality. Next week I’ll turn to Unitarian Universalist humanism, which offers a religion and system of ethics without God. Then I’ll move on to paganism and mysticism. But today, our topic is Unitarian Universalist theism. That is, a belief in God, however we might define that term.

From the start, I have to admit that my categories overlap. Unitarian Universalist Christians are often theists too—but not necessarily. There are Unitarian Universalists who find themselves inspired and challenged by the example of Jesus but who do not believe in God. There are other Unitarian Universalists who do not consider themselves Christian but who believe that we participate in something greater than ourselves that draws us toward what we can do and be.

This morning I’ll offer three ways of thinking about God that we find among Unitarian Universalists. These are not exclusive to UUs—we’ll find them among others as well. They are also not mutually exclusive. Some would contend that they simply are different ways of describing the elephant, so to speak. But perhaps they’ll offer ways of thinking about the experience that Rosemary Bray McNatt described as a loving Voice and Presence that changed her forever. Or what C. G. Jung described as “the experience of being gripped by something greater than myself.”

                                                                  ●  ●  ●

From time immemorial, human beings have peered into the mystery of existence and wondered about what they found. Some have conceived of a vast power that exists at the center of being. A calm and implacable force that serves as the foundation of all. A spirit that sustains life itself—a kind of sacred electricity—humming at the core of existence.

This is the God found in early religions—pre-Jewish, pre-Christian, pre-Islamic. These early peoples lived at the edges of the wilderness. Whatever fragile advances they made were vulnerable to being reclaimed by that wilderness. They sought assurance that the world—their world—would hold together. That what they depended upon for life would not disintegrate.

And so as they looked into the mystery of existence, they perceived something that resists chaos, that creates and sustains the world: a force of order and coherence that keeps things from falling apart.

As civilization developed, the perception of this power changed. It was still what sustained existence—and could be found deep within each living being. But its primary function was no longer just to keep the world from falling into chaos. Now it offered something more: enlightenment. The Buddha taught his followers to meditate, to live with compassion, to let desire slip away. In so doing they found union with this power at the center of being and gained release from the pain of this world.

This sense of an impersonal force at the center of creation continued to be invoked. Some found it in the principle of reason. The force that brings coherence to the universe was seen as a rational power, accessible to human understanding. Our world was seen as operating by coherent rules and principles. This is the concept of God called deism. According to the deists, the world is like a big clock—constructed according to principles that we can understand—and then left for us to maintain.
“What, then, is God?” In this view God is the structure of the universe, the force at the center of being that creates and holds things together and operates by principles that are available to us. This God is accessible to those who make the effort of learning and understanding. The Buddha taught that anyone who followed his principles could attain enlightenment. Others, from the Greek philosophers to Western scientists have believed that the secrets of the universe were available to human study and discovery.

Ralph Waldo Emerson's term for this God was the Oversoul. He wrote, “There is a deep power in which we exist and whose beatitude is accessible to us. Every moment when the individual feels invaded by it is memorable. It comes to the lowly and simple; it comes to whosoever will put off what is foreign and proud; it comes as insight; it comes as serenity and grandeur.

“Within us is the soul of the whole; the wise silence, the universal beauty, to which every part and particle is equally related; the eternal One.”

Today, this concept of God continues. The feminist Mary Daly asked “Why indeed must 'God' be a noun? Why not a verb—the most active and dynamic of all?” That is, a dynamic, impersonal force at the center of existence. As we tap into that source, we achieve understanding and inspiration to become who we can be.

                                                                  ●  ●  ●

Others have peered into the mystery of existence and found something different.

These people have encountered a God that can be experienced in human terms. This is the God Jesus addressed as, “Father.” This is the God Moses experienced as choosing him for a special mission. This is the God that guided the prophet Mohammed and that led him to success after success. This is the God that becomes involved in the everyday struggles of our lives.

Sometimes, the experience of a power greater than any of us is identified as “love.” The sense of being loved absolutely. What is God? A force or being that can somehow express love.

Sometimes the experience of a power greater than any of us is described as leading a person to what is true and right—a kind of advisor or trusted friend who shows us the way. What is God? A guide who helps us find the pathways that are ours.

Sometimes the experience of a power greater than any of us is known as joy, acceptance, forgiveness. What is God? A force at the center of the universe who forgives our sins and transgressions, who accepts us unconditionally.

Sometimes this God is experienced as a power drawing us toward each other. Relationship. Connection. A divine force that overcomes what stands between us and encourages reconciliation, justice, compassion. What is God? A force at the center of the universe who brings us into relationship.

And sometimes too people find a God who suffers with us. Who endures the struggles we endure as a companion, as a fellow traveler subject to the sorrows we too endure. In a book on religious experience, one person reported his experience of God in this way. He wrote, “I met with a very severe accident at work; at times the pain was excruciating, and yet, unmistakably, I felt a presence at my side as if someone was sharing the pain with me.”

Another described her experience of God in terms of love, “I was deeply distressed,” she said, “One evening I was sitting in a chair in our small study in the dark and became conscious of a Presence in the room just as you know when anyone else enters a room by their personality. I felt a golden, glorious feeling of love.”

What, then, is God? A force that somehow is able to relate on human terms. That brings us together, supports relationship, offers hope, and that may be experienced as acceptance, forgiveness, as joy. This is a God who can be talked to, prayed to, imagined as a person if necessary and addressed with human words and thoughts and feelings, a God who brings us closer to each other.

The contemporary Christian theologian Carter Heyward put it this way, “For god is nothing other than the eternally creative source of our relational power, our common strength, a god whose movement is to empower, bringing us into our own together, a god whose name in history is love.”

                                                                  ●  ●  ●

The experience of “something greater than ourselves” leads others to yet another concept of God. Here, the experience is not that of an impersonal yet accessible power at the center of being. And it is not that of a force that can be known and addressed in personal terms and with human categories. What these find as most characteristic of God is a sense of “otherness.” For them, God is so completely different from what we experience in everyday life that we cannot pretend to understand. In the Old Testament Book of Job, God tells Job, “My ways are not your ways,” and this same message is confirmed by those who feel they have come face to face with God. Human words do not exist to describe what they have encountered.

Rudolf Otto, who wrote a classic work called The Idea of the Holy, characterized the experience of God as something “wholly other.” He wrote, “The truly mysterious object is beyond our apprehension and comprehension, not only because our knowledge has certain irremovable limits, but because in it we come upon something inherently 'wholly other,' whose kind and character are incommensurable with our own, and before which we therefore recoil in wonder.”

One person described such an encounter, “I was walking along a road in my home town approaching an incline where the road branched and straight ahead was an old flint wall covered with ivy. I had the feeling of everything opening out (or a veil being lifted) and a wonderful feeling of lightness and freedom. It's so hard to describe. I remember feeling exquisitely happy and saying to myself, 'So that is what it is all about.' I cannot say what I saw—it was like infinity and a radiance at the same time. Very, very brief and then I was amazed to find myself still walking along the road.”

In the mystical religious traditions, God is considered beyond human understanding and control. Instead of trying to understand God and instead of seeking relationship with God, the faithful are urged to open themselves to the vast mystery of God. To set aside preconceptions and be available to what may be revealed.

The medieval German mystic, Meister Eckhart, put it this way, “God is a being beyond being and a nothingness beyond being. God is nothing. No Thing. God is nothingness. And yet God is something.”

What is God? In this view, God is beyond our comprehension. Hence, we must approach the divine with humility. God is not a genie who will grant wishes and not a pet who will fetch things upon our command. Whatever this force may be, it is greater than our understanding, greater than our control.

For at the center of creation is mystery: the nothingness which Meister Eckhart claimed is “something.” As one person put it, “A God comprehended is no God.”

                                                                  ●  ●  ●

As I was writing this sermon, I kept hearing words in my head by that famous theologian, Dr. Seuss, who proclaimed, “One fish, two fish, red fish, blue fish. Black fish, blue fish, old fish, new fish. This one has a little star. This one has a little car. Say! What a lot of fish there are.”

Same goes for concepts of God: What a lot of fish there are.

Dr. Seuss continues, “Yes. Some are red. And some are blue. Some are old. And some are new. Some are sad. And some are glad. And some are very, very bad.

“Why are they sad and glad and bad? I do not know. Go ask your Dad.”

In this sermon I have offered a few ways of conceiving God that we may find among Unitarian Universalists.

There is the concept of God as an impersonal force, yet available to human effort and understanding. Whether through tools of reason, meditation, yoga, artistic creativity or a variety of other techniques, this force is accessible to us. We can understand it, we can experience it, we can even use it to our benefit.

There is the concept of God as a being who can in some sense relate to us on a personal level. This is a God who cares: loves us, guides us, forgives us, offers salvation. This is a God to whom we may pray and from whom we may expect a response.

And there is the concept of God as mystery: as beyond human categories of perception and understanding. Yet the contemplation of this mystery is not without human benefit. Those who experience this mystery feel that they have been given an irreplaceable gift, a glimpse into a world beyond that changes their lives in this world.

Are we obligated to choose one and only one of these concepts of God? Or must we choose any at all? No. What we offer in a UU congregation is the freedom to explore and wonder, to let your own thoughts and experiences guide you to the belief that is authentic to you, right here, right now.

I’ll conclude by returning to the book from which I read for the Time For All Ages, What Is God?

So, if you really want to feel God,
You can close your eyes
And listen to your breath go slowly in and out,
And think how you are connected to everything,
Even if you are not touching everything.

Try to feel how you are connected
To your Dad, and how you are part of your Mom,
Try to feel how you are part of your whole family,
Like your brother or sister, your grandparents,
Your aunt or uncle, cousins, even your friends.

And try to feel how all of those people,
Are part of a whole bigger family,
And how all the families of the world,
(Even those we can't see or touch),
Are really a part of you and your family.

And if you can start to feel God like that,
Then maybe you will soon feel the whole answer,
To that very, very big question that everyone asks,
“What is God?”

                                                                    ●  ●  ●

 

 

MLK Banner

Reverend John Crestwell
Guest Ministers
A. Powell Davies
Religious Education
Davies Memorial Unitarian Universalist Church  7400 Temple Hills Road, Camp Springs, MD 20748  301-449-4308

Contact the Webweaver


Website designed by Shelton Graphics ©2009


Members are located In Maryland (MD) , Prince George's County (PG Co.) : Accokeek, Brandywine, Camp Springs, Cheverly, Clinton, District Heights, Forestville, Fort Washington, Friendly, Ft. Washington, Greenbelt, Marlton, Mitchellville, Oxon Hill, Suitland, Temple Hills, Upper Marlboro; Charles County: Indian Head, Port Tobacco, Waldorf, LaPlata, White Plains, Chicamuxen; Calvert County: Chesapeake Beach, Dunkirk, Owings, Solomons, Sunderland; Montgomery County: Silver Spring; Baltimore; Frederick County: Emmitsburg; Anne Arundel County: Deale, Tracys Landing; In Virginia (VA): Alexandria, Arlington, Falls Church; and Washington, D.C.